NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit
Parents of premature infants diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after using toxic baby formulas may be eligible to file a lawsuit. Several Similac and Enfamil formulas are cited in NEC lawsuits. In July 2024, a St. Louis jury awarded $495 million to the family of an infant who developed NEC after being fed Similac.
Latest NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit Updates
As of December 2024, there were 626 necrotizing enterocolitis baby formula lawsuits pending in multidistrict litigation. MDL 3026 is before U.S. District Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer in the Northern District of Illinois.
There have been no approved settlements or jury verdicts in the Illinois MDL which contains mostly Similac and Enfamil lawsuits, but a state court case in Illinois ended in a $60 million plaintiff’s verdict in March 2024. Another state court case in Missouri ended in a $496 million plaintiff’s verdict in July 2024. In October 2024, a St. Louis jury sided with both Abbott and Mead Johnson in the latest baby formula trial, breaking the trend of previous cases.
A trial schedule that was proposed in October lists the start of the first MDL bellwether trial as May 5, 2025.
Through our research of court documents and discussing these lawsuits with our legal partners, we’ll continue to provide updates and inform you of key moments in this litigation.
Baby Formula Litigation Timeline
-
October 2024
The latest state court baby formula trial has resulted in a victory for the defendants. A St. Louis jury sided with Abbott and Mead Johnson in a case where a mother of a premature infant who developed NEC had claimed that the companies failed to warn about risks of the intestinal disease. This result is a bit of a shakeup, after two state trials earlier this year ended in huge verdicts for plaintiffs.
There was also some big news in the MDL earlier this month, with parties proposing a schedule for the four bellwether cases. The first trial is set to start on May 5, 2025 with the four trials running through February 2026. Judge Pallmeyer will need to approve the schedule. -
September 2024
We have seen some big progress towards the first MDL cases going to trial, with the order of the four bellwether trials now decided. Ericka Mar, as Administratrix of the Estate of RaiLee Mar v. Abbott Laboratories is set to be up first. Judge Pallmeyer has directed counsel to now work to set firm trial dates for these four cases.
-
July 2024
More great news for plaintiffs who had a victory in court this month. A jury in St. Louis, Missouri awarded $495 million to the family of a baby girl who developed NEC after consuming Abbott premature infant formula in the NICU until 2021. The infant suffered irreversible neurological damage and will require long-term care. This is the second lawsuit to go to trial, the first trial was in March and ended in a $60 million verdict against Reckitt.
-
June 2024
Judge Pallmeyer released a scheduling order, and we finally had an idea of when the first bellwether test trial could occur. According to court documents we’ve researched, the close of fact discovery should be in the early part of August 2024. Depositions and proceedings will follow as the litigation heads for trial.
The estimated start of the bellwether test trial will be in May 2025. Before this MDL bellwether, a trial in an Illinois state court yielded a $60 million verdict for a mother who lost her child to NEC. This verdict could signal positive things for plaintiffs in the first bellwether and across the other cases in the MDL. We’ve yet to see if the defendants want to continue to litigate or discuss a global settlement. -
May 2024
MDL Judge Pallmeyer ordered that plaintiffs must have specific evidence that an infant ingested a Mead Johnson product before naming the company as a defendant in the litigation. Evidence may include medical and feeding records from birth.
-
March 2024
An Illinois jury ruled that Mead Johnson, a subsidiary of Reckitt Benckiser, must compensate the mother of a premature infant who died from an intestinal disease after being given the company's baby formula, Enfamil, with a verdict of $60 million.
-
February 2024
Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer scheduled hearings that involved several plaintiffs on sealed/private motions for March 2024.
-
December 2023
Four bellwether cases had been selected, but the start dates for the trials weren't confirmed. Lawyers expected the first trials might happen in 2024.
-
April 2023
Lawyers continued to negotiate how the discovery was to be conducted.
-
March 2023
The judge scheduled Science Day proceedings for May 3, 2023. Science Day allows the parties to present an overview of general medical and scientific issues to the court.
-
December 2022
Defendants selected four cases for bellwether test trials: Clarke, Cresap, Inman and Mar.
-
October 2022
The plaintiffs selected four bellwether test trials: Brown, Diggs, Lopez and Koeth. Randomly selected bellwether cases were McCarthy, Jacobs, Kelton and Donaldson.
There is also a separate class action MDL 3037 that we’ve found in Illinois for Abbott’s recalled infant formulas. This litigation is unrelated to the NEC formula lawsuits.
The two big plaintiffs’ verdicts we’ve seen in March and July 2024 will likely affect the litigation and bode well for plaintiffs. Brandan Smith, a mass torts and product liability lawyer with Simmons Hanly Conroy, told Drugwatch these verdicts wins for plaintiffs.
“Considerable jury verdicts can significantly impact the litigation as a whole by setting legal precedents, influencing the strategies of both plaintiffs and defendants, and encouraging settlements,” Smith said.
Award-winning baby formula lawyer Brendan Smith answers important questions about baby formula lawsuits.
- What’s the most important thing people should know about NEC lawsuits?
The intricacies of NEC baby formula lawsuits, which encompass detailed scientific and legal elements, necessitate potential plaintiffs finding a law firm with a proven track record in handling complex litigations against major corporations. It's essential to have your case thoroughly reviewed and your rights safeguarded.
- What are the qualifications for filing a lawsuit?
If your loved one consumed NEC baby formula, suffered an injury, and was diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), you might qualify to file an NEC lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
- What should people expect after contacting a firm to file a suit?
A team comprising lawyers, paralegals, and legal assistants will consult with you, collect case details, and obtain and review medical records. When the time is right, your lawyers will file the lawsuit and coordinate with you if further information is required.
Who Qualifies to File an NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit?
Our legal partners have informed us that parents and legal guardians who had a premature or low birth weight infant diagnosed with NEC after being fed cow’s milk baby formulas may qualify to file an NEC lawsuit.
You may file a lawsuit even years after your child was diagnosed with NEC. There are time limits called statutes of limitations, however. Only an attorney can tell you what the time limit is for you, so we recommend you contact an attorney right away to preserve your right to file a claim.
- Your child developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)
- Your child consumed formula that contained cow’s milk protein
- Your child was born prematurely or with a low birth weight
Your baby may have been fed Similac or Enfamil in the hospital. If you are unsure, your baby formula lawyer may be able to help you find out. Make sure you provide the name of the hospital and the hospital’s location.
After your baby was discharged from the hospital, you may have fed your baby a Similac or Enfamil formula product. NEC baby formula lawyers encourage parents to keep any receipts, proof of purchase, packaging or boxes from the formula for evidence in their potential baby formula lawsuit.
Finding an NEC Baby Formula Lawyer
The easiest way to find a baby formula lawyer is to click on our free case evaluation link on this page. You’ll be connected with our legal partners who are award-winning lawyers with extensive experience in complex litigation like baby formula lawsuits. They have been fighting against negligent corporations for many years on behalf of their clients and have track records of recovering billions of dollars in compensation.
Deciding who will represent you is an important decision. We recommend finding an NEC baby formula lawyer who has experience handling mass torts, which are large litigations for hundreds or thousands of claimants. These torts are typically against large corporations with big legal teams of their own, such as Mead Johnson and Abbott in this litigation.
Baby formula lawsuits are complex and could involve a lot of complicated science and law. Lawyers with extensive experience in large injury litigations are equipped to gather the proper evidence and prove their client’s case before a judge or jury. It’s also helpful to find an NEC baby formula lawyer who works with a firm that has a track record of settling cases and getting jury verdicts.
Why Are People Filing Baby Formula Lawsuits?
Parents have begun filing NEC lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers Mead Johnson and Abbott for failure to warn consumers about the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis, or NEC, linked to their cow’s milk baby formulas. Studies have shown that some premature babies who are fed certain Similac, Enfamil and other cow’s milk formulas are at higher risk of developing NEC, which is a rare intestinal disorder.
We’ve heard from parents and grandparents who have told us their tragic stories about an infant who suffered from NEC. The experiences they have been through are heartbreaking. In many cases, parents have told us they filed a lawsuit to hold baby formula makers accountable and deter them from future negligent behavior.
NEC baby formula lawsuits state that Abbott and Mead Johnson should have warned about the risk of NEC linked to Similac and Enfamil but continued to market these products as safe. NEC is rare, but it is serious and can be deadly for low birth weight and preterm infants.
Marie Smith filed her lawsuit against Mead Johnson and Abbott Laboratories after her premature infant, Amirea, died from NEC after just two weeks of life. Smith keeps her daughter’s baby blanket and clothes to remember her. While she doesn’t think a jury verdict will bring her daughter back, she hopes to spread awareness and spare another family the same fate.
“This is a feeling I would not wish on anyone… I feel like people have been lied to,” she told NBC affiliate KARE 11.
“This is a feeling I would not wish on anyone… I feel like people have been lied to.”
The Dangers of NEC
NEC, or necrotizing enterocolitis, is a gastrointestinal disease that affects infants, but more specifically, low birth weight and preterm infants. Babies with this disease may suffer from infections, intestinal perforation and other serious medical problems. NEC symptoms often start with feeding intolerance and may progress to systemic sepsis.
Sometimes, babies must undergo surgery to remove parts of their intestinal tract, leading to other life-long issues. Tragically, NEC may also lead to an infant’s death in up to 30% of cases, according to studies cited in lawsuits.
Preterm babies often receive popular cow’s milk formulas such as Enfamil and Similac in the hospital NICU to help them develop and grow. Parents may even take their babies home with the formula. However, studies have shown that cow’s milk baby formula increases the risk of NEC in preterm and low birth weight infants.
- No Warnings
- No warnings about the risk of NEC or death
- Defendants knew or should have known their products were not safe for preemies
- Defendants designed misleading marketing to convince doctors and parents of safety
- NEC and Preterm Infants
- Advanced cases of NEC may lead to surgery and even death
- NEC is more common in preterm infants fed cow’s milk formula versus breast milk
- Alternatives to cow’s milk fortifiers and formulas exist
- NEC Studies
- 1990: NEC is six to 10 times more common in exclusively formula-fed preemies
- 2009: Preemies on human milk-based 90% less likely to develop surgical NEC
- 2014: Up to 30% of preterm infants will die from NEC
Cow’s Milk Baby Formula Brands
Enfamil and Similac cow’s milk baby formulas are the main brands included in lawsuits, but other manufacturers also make cow’s milk formulas that could have led to NEC. Premature babies fed baby formula were at a significantly higher risk of developing NEC than those fed human milk exclusively, according to an observational study published in Neonatology.
Another study published in The Journal of Pediatrics found the risks of developing NEC were lower in breastfed babies than in those fed a combination of mother’s milk and infant formula.
- Avacare
- Baby’s Only
- Bobbie
- Earth’s Best
- Enfamil
- Gerber
- Happy Baby
- Holle
- Lebenswert
- Loulouka
- Kendamil
- Parent’s Choice
- PediaSure
- Similac
Mead Johnson and Abbott Laboratories products Enfamil and Similac have no warnings about NEC as a side effect of baby formula or proper instructions or guidelines for their use, according to parents who filed a Similac lawsuit or Enfamil lawsuit. The companies also marketed their products as safe and beneficial for premature infants despite the potential risks.
Parents are suing for extensive financial losses and emotional distress related to their baby’s injuries or death.
Have Enfamil and Similac Formulas Been Recalled?
Enfamil and Similac have not been recalled for the link between baby formula and NEC. But there have been isolated store recalls as a result of product tampering and there was a February 2022 recall for potential bacterial infection.
The tampering incident came to light when a few mothers reported that their Enfamil products contained flour instead of formula. In another incident, babies got sick and some died after drinking Enfamil which reportedly caused bacterial infections. The FDA tested the formula and declared it safe.
In February 2022, Abbott Nutrition issued a baby formula recall for certain lots of Similac, EleCare and Alimentum manufactured at its Sturgis, Michigan, facility after four babies suffered Cronobacter sakazakii infections and one baby became infected with Salmonella Newport. Two of the babies died.
The FDA released a preliminary inspection report in March 2022 that said that Abbott didn’t have “a system of process controls” in place to “ensure that infant formula does not become adulterated due to the presence of microorganisms.”
In June 2022, the FDA received an additional report of an infant death that could be related to bacterial contamination. The same month, Abbott’s Sturgis plant reopened to help ease the baby formula shortage caused in part by the recall.
Calling this number connects you with a Drugwatch.com representative. We will direct you to one of our trusted legal partners for a free case review.
Drugwatch.com's trusted legal partners support the organization's mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our partners page.