Benzocaine Lawsuits
Attorneys considered filing benzocaine lawsuits after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration warned that over-the-counter oral products containing benzocaine could cause a potentially fatal blood disorder called methemoglobinemia.
Editors carefully fact-check all Drugwatch.com content for accuracy and quality.
Drugwatch.com has a stringent fact-checking process. It starts with our strict sourcing guidelines.
We only gather information from credible sources. This includes peer-reviewed medical journals, reputable media outlets, government reports, court records and interviews with qualified experts.
Drugwatch.com has been empowering patients for more than a decade
Drugwatch.com has provided reliable, trusted information about medications, medical devices and general health since 2008. We’ve also connected thousands of people injured by drugs and medical devices with top-ranked national law firms to take action against negligent corporations.
Our team includes experienced medical writers, award-winning journalists, researchers and certified medical and legal experts. Drugwatch.com is HONCode (Health On the Net Foundation) certified. This means the high-quality information we provide comes from credible sources, such as peer-reviewed medical journals and expert interviews.
The information on Drugwatch.com has been medically and legally reviewed by more than 30 expert contributors, including doctors, pharmacists, lawyers, patient advocates and other health care professionals. Our writers are members of professional associations, including American Medical Writers Association, American Bar Association, The Alliance of Professional Health Advocates and International Society for Medical Publication Professionals.
About Drugwatch.com
- Assisting patients and their families since 2008.
- Helped more than 12,000 people find legal help.
- A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
- 5-star reviewed medical and legal information site.
Testimonials
"Drugwatch opened my eyes to the realities of big pharmacy. Having a family member with major depression and anxiety, I was looking for information on her medications. I found information that was very helpful, that her psychiatrist never told her."
Benzocaine Removed From Teething Products
Under pressure from an advocacy group, the FDA in May 2018 ordered manufacturers to warn consumers about the potentially deadly risks of using benzocaine products to treat teething pain in infants. The FDA effectively forced companies to remove benzocaine from baby teething products with it’s action.
The deaths of at least four people, including an infant, since 2009 were linked to an oxygen-draining side effect of benzocaine called methemoglobinemia, the FDA said.
Lawyers evaluated consumer lawsuits against benzocaine product manufacturers who didn’t properly warn the public. Drugwatch is unaware of any attorneys currently accepting benzocaine lawsuits years after the chemical faced a de facto ban from the FDA.
A long-known side effect of benzocaine, methemoglobinemia happens when oxygen levels in the blood drop dangerously low. Symptoms can develop within two hours of using the products. They include cyanosis (bluish color of the skin) and chocolate brown-colored blood.
More than 400 people developed methemoglobinemia from benzocaine use since 1971, the FDA said. The four methemoglobinemia deaths happened between February 2009 and October 2017.
As of December 2024, there have been no new updates in this litigation. Drugwatch is unaware of any attorneys currently accepting benzocaine lawsuits at this time.
Public Citizen Lawsuit & FDA Warnings
The advocacy group Public Citizen filed a lawsuit against the FDA in 2017. The lawsuit sought to force the agency to act on a petition Public Citizen had filed in 2014 over benzocaine uses and warnings.
The petition asked the agency to remove infant teething pain as an approved use for benzocaine.
Public Citizen asked that the label advise against using products with that chemical for infant teething pain. The group also requested warnings about the risk of methemoglobinemia on all benzocaine products used in oral care.
Public Citizen’s lawsuit says regulators have known as far back as 1991 that the chemical is linked to methemoglobinemia. But no warnings were issued to the public for more than 25 years.
In 1991, the FDA classified benzocaine as an over-the-counter analgesic and anesthetic. It noted such products are not necessary or useful to relieve teething pain. That’s because they tend to wash off the baby’s gums within minutes.
Panel Knew About Risks
At that time, the advisory review panel involved in the classification recognized that the link to methemoglobinemia, according to Public Citizen.
The panel also knew that infants are more susceptible to the condition.
Between 2003 and 2014, the FDA issued several safety announcements regarding benzocaine’s risk of methemoglobinemia.
FDA Director: We Share Concerns
In 2014, the agency told manufacturers of over-the-counter, oral-health products it wouldn’t object if they added a warning about the blood condition to their product labels.
The FDA did not require the warning until May 23, 2018, a day before it responded to Public Citizen’s lawsuit and petition.
“We have carefully considered your requests and share your concerns regarding the risk to public health posed by over-the-counter (OTC) oral health care drug products containing benzocaine,” said a letter from Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
“In particular, we agree that any potential benefits of using OTC oral health care drug products containing benzocaine to treat sore gums in infants and children due to teething do not outweigh the risks of methemoglobinemia associated with these products. We also agree that there are methemoglobinemia risks for adults and children 2 years and older when using OTC oral health care drug products containing benzocaine.”
The FDA also urged manufacturers to stop marketing over-the-counter oral products for teething in infants and children younger than 2.
“If companies do not comply, we will take action to remove these products from the market,” the FDA announcement said.
Public Citizen’s health research group director, Michael Carome, chastised the FDA for taking so long.
“The agency undoubtedly would not have taken these actions now had Public Citizen not petitioned the agency to do so and sued the agency to compel it to respond to our petition,” Carome said in a statement. “Although we support the FDA’s action, it comes too late for some infants and children.”
At least one company, Church and Dwight Co. Inc., said it would discontinue teething products.
The New Jersey-based company withdrew four Orajel teething brands, including Orajel Medicated Teething Swabs and Baby Orajel.
“We are not discontinuing other Orajel products, which represent the majority of our Orajel offering,” the company said in a statement emailed to CBS News.
Calling this number connects you with a Drugwatch.com representative. We will direct you to one of our trusted legal partners for a free case review.
Drugwatch.com's trusted legal partners support the organization's mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our partners page.