Polypropylene Mesh

Polypropylene is the second most widely manufactured type of plastic in the world behind only polyethylene. Manufacturers use it in a wide range of products, including furniture, carpeting, electronic components and medical devices.

Hernia mesh manufacturers use polypropylene in part because it is an inert plastic. That means it is chemically inactive and should minimize patient complications. However, some researchers suggest its properties may change after it is implanted.

Polypropylene characteristics include durability and strength. Polypropylene’s tensile strength — or ability to resist breaking under tension — is comparable to steel. These are all selling points for polypropylene’s success as a hernia mesh.

Most hernia mesh surgeries in the U.S. rely on polypropylene mesh. It is a durable yet flexible synthetic surgical mesh. Polypropylene mesh is a synthetic surgical mesh used for hernia and other soft tissue repairs. It works as a scaffold.

Surgeons stitch torn tissue to the mesh to close a hernia. This leaves less tension on the damaged tissue. The first modern hernia mesh repair in 1958 used polypropylene mesh. Later, minimally invasive techniques popularized its use in hernia surgery.

While many brands of polypropylene mesh perform well in hernia repairs, some brands have been associated with several serious hernia mesh complications. Thousands of people have filed hernia mesh lawsuits over problems they experienced after receiving these brands of polypropylene mesh.

Polypropylene mesh is the most common type of mesh used for hernia repair. Other leading mesh materials include polyester and ePTFE, a fluorocarbon polymer best known by the brand name Teflon.

Manufacturers may combine these materials with others, including titanium, or they may coat meshes in materials to promote absorption or to prevent infection.

Polypropylene has several features that make it one of the most popular materials for hernia mesh. It is thin and lightweight.

Polypropylene allows manufacturers to create a mesh with large pores and minimal surface area. But all hernia mesh materials come with unique advantages and disadvantages.

Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Coatings

Manufacturers may sometimes coat polypropylene mesh with additional materials. This creates what the industry calls a composite mesh.

The coatings may contain materials designed to help the body adapt to mesh. Or they may provide medicines to prevent infection.

“These have a coating on one side [and] are designed to be placed in the peritoneal side of the abdominal wall — in direct contact with the intestines,” Dr. Mazen Al-Mansour, a hernia surgeon and assistant professor at the University of Florida College of Medicine’s department of surgery, told Drugwatch. “The coated side is intended to minimize adhesions — scarring that results in the intestines being densely fixed against the mesh.”

There are several barrier-coated meshes on the market widely used by surgeons to repair hernias. Most of them perform well. But recent recalled barrier meshes include Ethicon’s Physiomesh and Atrium’s Q-QUR.

Physiomesh

Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh consisted of a polypropylene mesh base between two absorbable films. Ethicon removed this model of Physiomesh from the market after European hernia registries reported a higher-than-expected complication rate.

C-QUR

C-QUR Mesh combines polypropylene mesh with an Omega-3 gel coating. The company’s website says the coating is “derived from highly purified pharmaceutical grade fish oil.”

Bowel obstructions and perforations are among the most serious polypropylene hernia mesh complications. These can sometimes be medical emergencies and require immediate surgery. Hernia mesh can also cause mesh infection, which is severe and difficult to eliminate.

According to a 2024 study published in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open, synthetic meshes are more prone to infection, while biological meshes have higher recurrence rates and costs. 

To avoid complications, researchers wrote, surgeons must carefully evaluate patient risk factors, select appropriate mesh types and techniques, and optimize operating conditions. 

Polypropylene mesh also shares several complications with other types of hernia mesh. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration says the most serious hernia mesh complications are associated with mesh brands that are no longer on the market or were the subject of hernia mesh recalls.

Polypropylene Hernia Mesh and Chronic Pain

Chronic pain is the most common complication of hernia mesh surgery. But it is still unclear how common it is.

Chronic pain is defined as pain lasting a year or more following surgery.

A presentation at the 2018 International Hernia Congress looked at chronic pain occurring much later after surgery. Researchers found 95% of such chronic pain cases may not happen until 10 years after surgery. In one case, the pain occurred 24 years after surgery.

Polypropylene Mesh and Infection Risk

Polypropylene mesh is associated with fewer infections than other types of hernia mesh. However, infection remains one of the most common complications of hernia mesh surgery.

Infection may occur weeks, months or even years after surgery. A 2015 study in the Indian Journal of Surgery compared early and late infection onset. The study, “Early- Versus Late-Onset Prosthetic Mesh Infection: More that Time Alone,” looked at outcomes for about 100 patients.

Researchers found that infection involving polypropylene mesh was more likely to happen more than a year after surgery. Most cases involved other complications. These included the mesh or surrounding scar tissue adhering to internal organs or blocking the bowel.

Polypropylene Mesh and Hernia Mesh Rejection

Polypropylene is not generally toxic to humans. However, patients may experience hypersensitivity issues or other reactions to polypropylene mesh. This can sometimes lead to mesh rejection or other complications.

Polypropylene Mesh Degradation

A 2012 letter published in The Journal of Urology warned of potential problems with polypropylene degradation in the body. The letter was titled “Post-Implantation Alterations of Poly Propylene in the Human.” Its three authors pointed to case studies of polypropylene mesh shrinking or other physical changes after it was implanted.

They warned that some of the chemicals used to manufacture polypropylene mesh may “behave as toxic substances” as the mesh degrades.

At least 120 surgical mesh products can trace their approval ancestry back to Ethicon’s Prolene Polypropylene Mesh. This was a surgical mesh on the market before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulated medical devices.

All new polypropylene surgical meshes in the U.S. are approved through the FDA’s 510(k) process. That method only requires a device manufacturer to show a “substantial equivalence” to a medical device the FDA already approved.

A 2018 research article titled “The Regulatory Ancestral Network of Surgical Meshes” looked into the 510(k) process. It found that mesh manufacturers often compare new products to meshes that were recalled or associated with serious complications.

Researchers looked at 77 new meshes approved between 2013 and 2015. They then traced the “regulatory ancestry” of the devices.

Companies compared their new meshes to older devices that in turn had been compared to even older meshes all to show “substantial equivalence.”

Researchers found, 97 percent of the new designs could trace their lineage back to just six surgical meshes. All were available prior to 1976 when the FDA started regulating hernia mesh.

Polypropylene Transvaginal Mesh

Polypropylene is also used to make other surgical meshes, including transvaginal mesh. In May 2018, CBS’s “60 Minutes” program reported on problems with Boston Scientific’s polypropylene transvaginal mesh.

Chevron Phillips made a polypropylene material it called Marlex. Boston Scientific used it to make transvaginal mesh. Chevron warned Boston Scientific that Marlex should never be permanently implanted in the body.

Boston Scientific continued to use Marlex. Changing to another type of polypropylene would require getting another FDA approval.

The CBS report claimed Boston Scientific found another Marlex supplier in China. But the supply turned out to be substandard, according to “60 Minutes.”

Tens of thousands of women have complained of serious complications from transvaginal mesh. More than 100,000 have filed transvaginal mesh lawsuits.

As of November 2024, there were 26,291 hernia mesh lawsuits in different federal multidistrict litigations (MDLs). The lawsuits claim complications they suffered after receiving mesh hernia repairs. MDLs allow several similar cases to move more quickly through the legal process.

Four hernia mesh manufacturers were involved in MDLs. All but one involves polypropylene-based hernia meshes.